自分のワークルフローを定義する

このページの内容

お困りですか?

アトラシアン コミュニティをご利用ください。

コミュニティに質問

This page provides brief outlines of three different ways that a development team could use Crucible for code reviews:

For a detailed example of how to perform Crucible reviews with two participants, see The Crucible workflow.

Lightweight code commenting with Crucible (individual)

  1. Author commits new work.
  2. Author creates the review, and adds comments using the easy web interface.
  3. Author summarizes and closes the review, saving the code comments in Crucible (and not in the code repository).

    Lightweight code commenting

 

One-to-many reviews without a moderator (Agile team)

  1. Author creates the review.
  2. Author invites reviewers to take part in the review.
  3. Reviewers make comments on the code.
  4. Author responds to reviewer comments, making follow-up comments as necessary.
  5. Reviewers complete their reviews.
  6. Author summarizes and closes the review.

    one-to-one-review

 

Formal group reviews (CMM team)

  1. Author creates the review.
  2. Moderator invites reviewers to take part in the review.
  3. Reviewers make comments on the code.
  4. Author responds to reviewer comments.
  5. Follow-up comments are made if necessary.
  6. Each discussion point is settled by the Moderator.
  7. Moderator summarizes and closes the review.

    Moderated review

最終更新日: 2019 年 2 月 14 日

この内容はお役に立ちましたか?

はい
いいえ
この記事についてのフィードバックを送信する
Powered by Confluence and Scroll Viewport.